By the Sea Clippings 19/43
R. W. Daremore, Photo-play Review, New York, May 11, 1915.
By the Sea Scene
& A Hysterical Landmark Back in the time when movie-making
was at the height of its madness, the Bradbury mansion
in Hollywood was used by the great and the great-to be as both
a location and a studio. No one has ever counted the
bruises born of slapstick falls upon its stairs. (...) They and
pictures like them will soon be all that remains to
recall the old Bradbury house, for it is now being turn down.
(...) Motion Picture, June 1929
& Bradbury Mansion, Chaplin‘s new studio after returning
in April 1915 to Los Angeles –Chaplin Essanay Studio,
Los Angeles, undated, California Historical Society, Title Insurance
and Trust Photo Collection, Department of
Special Collections, University of Southern California
& Kitty Kelly
(...) Chicago Sunday Tribune, Jan. 3, 1915
& A READER: No, Charles Chaplin is neither dead
nor married. You‘re welcome.
(...) Chicago Sunday Tribune, May 16, 1915
& Chaplin Back in Los Angeles.
Charles Chaplin has established himself and his company
in Los Angeles, the place that suits him better
than any other for the making of more of his pictures.
(...) ANSWERS TO MOVIE FANS.
Chicago Tribune, May 12, 1915
„By far the poorest“
Editorial content. „New York.
By R. W. Daremore.“ (...)
„By the Sea, Charlie Chaplin‘s latest release is by far
the poorest he has done lately. There is too much
,sameness‘ about this picture and altogether too much slap-stick
work. Charlie is a big favorite of mine, but I really think
he will have to inject few more new stunts and bits of business
into future pictures if he wants to keep his name where it is
today. Even after all this, I must say that By the Sea is laughable,
much more so than many so-called comedies, and perhaps
we expect too much of this well-known comedian.“
Redaktioneller Inhalt
