The Gold Rush 1923 1924 1926 next previous
The Gold Rush Clippings 322/363
Variety, New York, November 25, 1925.
Marcus Loew
(...) Photo, Motion Picture News, Oct. 20, 1923, detail
„While the deal is blocked“
Editorial content. „Chaplin Blocking M-G-U. A. Merger;
Honor Agreement Between U. A. Stars
Mary Pickford Reported Not Any Too Strongly in Favor
of Consolidation – Chaplin Says He Stands for Open Market,
Opposed to Any ,Trust‘ – Nathan Burkan Emphasizes
Remarks Directed at Douglas Fairbanks in Conference –
Marcus Loew Expected on Coast
Los Angeles, Nov. 24.
Charlie Chaplin is temporarily blocking the contemplated
distribution merger of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer with United Artists.
Mr. Chaplin admits it. He informed a Variety reporter
yesterday, following a conference of the parties lasting for six
hours, that he stands for an open market for pictures
and is opposed to any semblance of a ,trust.‘ Chaplin added
he feels that all exhibitors should have an opportunity
to purchase any film product.
Chaplin is reported to have insisted at the conference
he be more fully informed concerning the intended
merger before giving his personal consent. Chaplin‘s stand,
according to the account, is that he is reinforced through
an honor agreement between the original stars of the United
Artists that they cling together as one on any business
proposition that may affect their interest.
Marcus Loew is expected to leave New York daily,
to be here should the negotiations continue until
the time of arrival. Among those in the conferences at present
are Joe and Nick Schenck (brothers), Douglas Fairbanks,
Mary Pickford (Mrs. Fairbanks), J. Robert Rubin, attorney for
M-G-M and its secretary; Nathan Burkan, counsellor
for Chaplin; Dennis F. O‘Brien, counsellor for Mr. Fairbanks
and Mrs. Pickford, and Hiram Abrams, present head
of U. A.
At the conference yesterday Mr. Burkan spoke
at some length, emphasizing his remarks and pointing most
of them in the direction of Fairbanks.
Miss Pickford Expresses Opinion
Miss Pickford is reported lukewarm on the merger.
She is said to have expressed an opinion to this effect to mutual
friends Sunday.
Chaplin is reported of the impression that while the deal
is blocked, Mr. Fairbanks and his wife must stand with
him under the honor obligation. Chaplin‘s present attitude is
similar to the one assumed by him when Joe Schenck
was admitted into United Artists some months ago.
The conference yesterday was held at the Pickford studio.
It has been resumed today.
While it is the belief the merger will duly occur,
just when has now become a matter of doubt. It is not thought
Chaplin is holding out for any special terms or
advantage for himself through becoming an objector,
but wants to protect his future pictures for dull
circulation, here and abroad, without being tied to any kind
of a distributing agreement that may limit the
distribution, even though it should guarantee as full
a gross return in money as a Chaplin picture
might bring otherwise.
That Word ,Trust‘
In New York among those conversant with the controversy
over the U. A.-M.-G.-M. distributing merger, the word
.Trust‘ in the reported objections of Charlie Chaplin appears
to portend something more than the mere union in
distribution of Metro-Goldwyn and United Artists. The merger
in itself is an economical move, and doubtlessly
recognized as so by all associated in the deal. Variety reported
last week the merged M-G and U. A. exchanges,
through the abandonment of the U. A. exchanges, would
effect an immediate actual saving of 41,000,000
annually in operating expense alone.
Marcus Loew said Monday when asked if he intended
to go to the Coast, that he expected to but would give
no reason nor time of departure. Nick Schenck, of Loew‘s, has
been representing the Loew end, also Metro-Goldwyn,
together with J. Robert Rubin, the attorney.
Just wether the employment of ,Trust‘ in the Chaplin talk
indicate a belief that the M-G-M-U. A. merger is but
a preliminary to a juncture at some definite time of that
combination with Famous Players is something
the New Yorkers are not prepared to talk of with authority.
They appear to feel there is a drift toward an idea
of that sort. That again brings up the matter of ,The Big Three,‘
including Famous, M-G and First National.“ (...)
Redaktioneller Inhalt
The Gold Rush 1923 1924 1926 next previous